Mass Action and Conservation of Current

Authors

  • Robert S. Eisenberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/hjic-2016-0001

Keywords:

law of mass action, current continuity, chemical device design, variational methods, ion channels

Abstract

The law of mass action does not force a series of chemical reactions to have the same current flow everywhere. Interruption of far-away current does not stop current everywhere in a series of chemical reactions (analyzed according to the law of mass action), and so does not obey Maxwell’s equations. An additional constraint and equation is needed to enforce global continuity of current. The additional constraint is introduced in this paper in the special case that the chemical reaction describes spatial movement through narrow channels. In that case, a fully consistent treatment is possible using different models of charge movement. The general case must be dealt with by variational methods that enforce consistency of all the physical laws involved. Violations of current continuity arise away from equilibrium, when current flows, and the law of mass action is applied to a nonequilibrium situation, different from the systems considered when the law was originally derived. Device design in the chemical world is difficult because simple laws are not obeyed in that way. Rate constants of the law of mass action are found experimentally to change from one set of conditions to another. The law of mass action is not robust in most cases and cannot serve the same role that circuit models do in our electrical technology. Robust models and device designs in the chemical world will not be possible until continuity of current is embedded in a generalization of the law of mass action using a consistent variational model of energy and dissipation.

Author Biography

Robert S. Eisenberg

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago IL 60612, USA

Downloads

Published

2016-08-20

How to Cite

Eisenberg, R. S. (2016). Mass Action and Conservation of Current. Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/hjic-2016-0001